July 9, 2010 by Carol Vipperman
I hesitate to add to the already rampant coverage of the Russian spies that were swapped today in Vienna, but as someone who cares about our bilateral relationship, I feel a need to weigh in on the topic.
True this is the largest swap of spies in decades and therefore deserves to be observed and reported; however, the media coverage has been fascinating, to say the least. It has ranged from the amusing, such as the Daily’s show coverage (worth watching by the way), to more serious coverage, including a map of the timing of the swap on NPR, and much more. And without a doubt there will be continued analysis of who did what, why the arrests were timed when they were, how the spies are adjusting and what this means for our US-Russian relationship. For me the readiness of both sides to make this swap happen quickly is a clear indication that our increased cooperation and newly “reset” relationship is a priority, which is good news.
Although the Russian spy story has made for interesting and tantalizing media coverage, it has unfortunately stirred up old, cold war feelings of mistrust and suspicion. It is well understood by most Americans that all countries have intelligence services active around the world; however, it seems that Russia holds a very special place in people’s minds. For Russians who live here, this incident has set off a number of reactions so well captured by one blogger, Yuri Mamchur, in his piece: Thanks a lot, Kremlin! For those of us who work to strengthen our economic and community ties, it has been a bit frustrating. There are far more interesting and compelling stories of how Russians and Americans are working together to improve our communities that do not see the light of day in the media.
The bottom line is that the resolve to improve the relationship between our countries is firm and that we have more work to do to help dispel those lingering suspicions.
Posted in US-Russia Relations | Tagged Russia, US-Russia Relations, Spies | 1 Comment »
April 23, 2010 by Carol Vipperman
There has been much in the press lately about Russia’s need and interest in becoming more energy-efficient. The United Nations Development Program (UNDP) just published a report on the “Energy Sector and Sustainable Development.” It is comprehensive report (all 170 pages), which lays out the human and economic impacts if Russia continues as an energy “inefficient” country.
The risk of ‘Dutch Disease’ will worsen by 2020 and predicts that “Russian oil and gas will run out in 21.9 years and 9.4 years, respectively”. The report states that Russia should turn its focus on innovation in the energy sector.
There are many obstacles to face, including legislative, as outlined in Forbes, as well as, “lack of motivation, lack of information, lack of funding and long-term investments as well as lack of organization and coordination” according to the report.
In spite of these obstacles, Russia’s regions have been pioneers, the UNDP reports. Laws have been enacted in 43 regions, many have energy-saving programs, and 75 regions have established funds and agencies to work on energy efficiency. In the top ten regions that are considered most energy-efficient, two regions, the Amur Region and Chukotka, are number 5 and 8 respectively, with the Sakhalin Region coming in at number 17.
This report urges the Russian government to put a real emphasis on energy efficiency on all levels of government. President Medvedev has listed energy efficiency as a key area for modernization in a recent speech to the DUMA. However, at the moment, it is the responsibility of the Ministry of Economic Development and it is not surprising that energy efficiency has appeared on the list of top priorities for the Business Development and Economic Relations Working Group under the Presidential Bilateral Commission.
Although some see the obvious need for European expertise and technologies, as well as direct investment in energy efficiency projects, the United States, and, in particular, the Pacific Northwest could play an important role. The Pacific Northwest is increasingly seen as a leader in energy efficiency in both expertise and technologies. Perhaps a partnership between the Russian Far East regions and the Northwest will give a boost to Russia’s move to energy efficiency while, at the same time, creating jobs and other joint opportunities for both country’s businesses. It is worth exploring.
Posted in Business, US-Russia Relations | Tagged Russia, US Russia, energy efficiency | Leave a Comment »
April 15, 2010 by Carol Vipperman
At 4am on April 15th, Russia closed down its last plutonium plant in Zheleznogorsk. Although this came at the end of a very successful nonproliferation meeting in Washington, DC this closure has been in the works for at least a decade.
I know Zheleznogorsk well. FRAEC worked with the Department of Energy for seven years through its Nuclear Cities Initiative to help find civilian jobs for the citizens of Zheleznogorsk who worked with the plutonium reactor. We helped create the International Development Center, a Russian nonprofit organization, to be the vehicle for this goal. The IDC still operates today in Zheleznogorsk providing real assistance to the many businesses and individuals who work there.
The issue of closing the reactor has been a very sensitive one for the people of Zheleznogorsk. The reactor provided heat and electricity to the city and the winters there get very cold – -40 degrees C. I know. I was there on many cold winter days. During one trip, I felt the frustration and anger of some of its leaders when asked if we could guarantee that they would have a new fossil fuel plant replacement, built with U.S. funds and contractors, in time. Those of us who were there did not have anything to do with this project, but they vented anyway.
The closure is good for Russia, the U.S. and the world. Hopefully the new plant will be open and heating the city soon.
Posted in US-Russia Relations | Tagged Russia, US Russian, nuclear reactors | Leave a Comment »
March 4, 2010 by Carol Vipperman
Twenty-five years ago this month, Gorbachev assumed the top leadership post in the Soviet Politburo. I had not remembered this date, but was reminded while reading an interesting article in Russian Life (an excellent magazine) about Perestroika. It was a first-hand report by Tamara Eidelman, a teacher in Moscow and the magazine’s history editor, of the changes and the impact it had on the Soviet people. What struck me the most was that the people heard on television that the Soviet “economy was not as wonderful” as they had been pretending. Gorbachev talked about the economy and the role of scientific and technical progress to the citizens of the Soviet Union. She writes that he believed that “we needed to ‘accelerate,’ that computers and robots would lead the country out of crisis.” Reflecting on the last twenty-five years, she was nostalgic about that marvelous spring of 1985. She writes, “It truly seemed possible to change everything for the better without any blood or horror. We just needed more computers.”
Although this was both a very interesting and personal account of that dramatic time in the Soviet Union, Russian people are now hearing (again) from their leaders that modernization” and “innovation” is essential to Russia’s future. Of course innovation is critical to all economies and finding ways to achieve innovation is the trick. Today, Prime Minister Putin spearheaded a new commission on innovation to “enforce its modernization agenda” and is prepared to “assign 1.1 trillion rubles [$36.8 billion], or more than 10 percent of the federal budget, for fundamental and applied sciences, higher education, high-tech medicine and specialized federal programs.” This investment is needed and signals, perhaps, a real commitment to innovation.
But not all agree. In an opinion piece in The Moscow Times, Modernization by Gosplan, Vladislav Inozemtsev cites the flaws in the approach to innovation. He highlights that the “fundamental problem in Russia’s approach to modernization is that it doesn’t seem to understand – or at least it blatantly ignores – the fact that you can’t have a centrally planned innovative economy.” He states that there is only one path – “that is the path of industrial revival based on Western technologies, the rapid liberalization of the economy in combination with gradual political reforms and a fundamental rapprochement with Europe and the U.S.”
Whether or not you agree with his assessment it is very clear that modernization is essential for Russia’s economic future and involving Western technologies and partners would be good for everyone. It would provide more business opportunities and scientific collaborations hopefully creating more jobs. Twenty-five years from now, when we look back at this important time for modernization, we hope that we won’t think as Tamara Eidelman did, that “we just needed more computers.”
Posted in Business | Tagged Gorbachev, modernization, Putin | Leave a Comment »
February 19, 2010 by Carol Vipperman
I have been remiss about posting since our 20th anniversary last year, so I am making a commitment to do so more frequently. I hope that all of you who read our blog will remind me if we slip a little.
As for many 2009 was a busy year, but for us, following our anniversary celebration with Vladimir Pozner, we found it a tremendous launching point for the future. Twenty years is an accomplishment, one that we are very proud of, and we received so many wonderful comments from people around the world congratulating us. But no one person or organization can rest on its laurels, so with the start of 2010 we are exploring new ideas, projects and issues that can assist in advancing our bilateral relationship. I will be writing more about these in other posts.
One new aspect for FRAEC is that we are upping our visibility through a live journal blog in Russian and English, a YouTube Channel- FRAEC1, that we will add more videos, and we are now on Facebook, so check out all of these and let us know what you think.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged US-Russia Relations, 2010 | Leave a Comment »
October 3, 2009 by Carol Vipperman
On my way back to Seattle from Sakhalin I read an article in the St. Petersburg Times entitled “The Country Russia Loves to Hate” by Vladimir Ryzhkov, a former Duma deputy and now a host of a political talk show on Ekho Moskvy radio. He cites a poll recently conducted by the Levada Center indicating that only 2.1 percent of all Russians consider the United States a friend and 45.4 percent see the United States as Russia’s enemy. In the article, Ryzhkov claims that this negative feeling is growing, despite the change in leadership in the U.S.
You can only imagine my dismay having just participated in our bilateral forum, the Russian American Pacific Partnership (RAPP), just days before. There the mood was upbeat and many talked about the “new opportunities” for our two countries due to the “reset of the relationship”. Granted we were at a meeting with people who had “shared interests”, but to read the results of this poll was discouraging. Even Ryzhkov was surprised by the findings. According to the Levada Center study, “Russian respondents were positive that the United States is to blame for the main problems in the world today.”
The article highlights another study conducted in June that indicated that, “85 percent of Russians, as well as their friends and relatives, have never been to the United States” and an 95 percent of respondents said that they “never had any form of contact with an American, or only a brief encounter.”
At our RAPP breakout session on Community Development: Public-Private Cooperation, the importance of exchanges was discussed at length. Over the years many Russians from business, academia, science, government, nongovernment and youth organizations have traveled to the U.S. on U.S. government funded exchange programs. These exchanges help build understanding and further cooperative efforts, a worthwhile investment in my opinion. However, at the meeting it was noted that the number of U.S. youth coming to Russia has decreased. There was a strong call for more funded programs to bring young American students to Russia.
This call for more engagement through exchanges, to bring more Russians in contact with Americans, is an important tool to help improve our mutual understanding and image. Clearly we have some work to do if these polls are indicative of the larger impression by Russians of the United States.
Posted in US-Russia Relations | Leave a Comment »
October 1, 2009 by Carol Vipperman
Russian Foreign Deputy Minister Ryabkov and Deputy Ex-Plenipotentiary Representative Levintal
“Spark and exploit” new opportunities was one of the messages at the 14th Annual Meeting of the Russian American Pacific Partnership (RAPP) held on Sakhalin Island this week. U.S. and Russian federal leaders listened to the issues in our trans-pacific relationship. Just less than one month away from the first meeting of the Presidential Bilateral Commission Co-chairs, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, RAPP participants seized the opportunity to give their recommendations and perspectives.
At the opening plenary, Sakhalin Governor Alexander Khoroshavin captured the mood of the past 15 years by stating that in the ‘90’s we were optimistic then disillusioned and now the meeting’s theme, “ A Meeting of Shared Interests”, captures the new possibilities we face. Russian Foreign Deputy Minister Sergey Ryabkov, fresh from the G-20 and United Nations meetings, cited the uniqueness of the Russian Far East (RFE) region and RAPP. Interregional cooperation, according to Ryabkov, is becoming more important in Russia’s strategy. Improving small and medium-sized business and alternative energy cooperation is a priority that he asked RAPP to address. Alexander Levintal, Deputy Ex-plenipotentiary Representative of the President of Russia in the Far Eastern Federal District, highlighted the importance of developing the “intellectual economy” in the RFE and that RAPP is a “permanent player” in the region. Matthias Mitman, Economic Minister Counselor at the U.S. Embassy in Moscow, echoed the call for building prosperity through the intellectual economy and stated that the Pacific Basin is acknowledged as the “most dynamic region in the world”.
In a discussion on the priorities of the new Presidential commission, the federal representatives responded to questions from the participants. When asked as to how this new commission is different from the previous Gore-Chernomyrdin Commission, the response was: “more proactive and results driven” and “less bureaucratic”. The Business Development and Economic Relations Working Group, co-chaired by Secretary of Commerce Gary Locke and Minister of Economic Development Elvira Nabiullina, has on its current agenda 10 items including a placeholder for the recommendations from this RAPP meeting.
In the afternoon 19 presentations were delivered by key U.S. and Russian leaders on Oil and Gas, Technologies, Russian Priority Development projects, Community Development and Transportation providing the basis for discussion in the breakout sessions the next day. Over 25 recommendations emerged from the breakout sessions focused on Expanding Trans-Pacific Bilateral Trade, Opportunities through Applied Technologies and Community Development and Public-Private Cooperation. The report with these recommendations will be forwarded to the Bilateral Commission and will be made available to the public soon.
This was a special time for this meeting. Not just because of the newly formed Presidential Bilateral Forum, which gave new energy and excitement to the work of those attending RAPP, but also because the closing day was on September 29th. Just 15 years ago on that day, President Boris Yeltsin announced in Seattle that he wanted to “create a new relationship” between the US West Coast and the Russian Far East. No one then understood how important that proclamation would be for our trans-pacific relationship. We have come a long way since then and there is more to come.
Posted in Business, US-Russia Relations, Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »
I hesitate to add to the already rampant coverage of the Russian spies that were swapped today in Vienna, but as someone who cares about our bilateral relationship, I feel a need to weigh in on the topic.
